We know one thing for sure about the wave of Clinton-related scandals over the years: People will go to any lengths to spot them and use them as fresh "proof" that Hillary and Bill Clinton are corrupt.
Take, for example, a Wall Street Journal article that alleged … well, it's not entirely clear what it alleged. It tries to make something of a set of facts. One, Hillary and Bill Clinton have been close to Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe. Two, McAuliffe recruited Dr. Jill McCabe to run for a Virginia State Senate seat in 2015 and was responsible for raising most of the money for her campaign. Three, McCabe's husband was a senior FBI official, who, after the campaign, was promoted to deputy director and wound up involved in the investigation of Clinton's emails.
What does that add up to? "Nothing" would be the pretty obvious answer.
The implication seems to be that Dr. McCabe was given something by the Clintons' ally to secure better treatment for Hillary Clinton from Andrew McCabe.
Only three things are wrong with that theory.